From lurker-index@localhost Fri Sep 23 15:11:55 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 23 Sep 2016 13:11:55 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:29:04 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:61192 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bnKuo-0007v3-Cf for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:28:59 +0200 Received: (qmail 15160 invoked by uid 611); 23 Sep 2016 07:26:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 15065 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2016 07:25:18 -0000 Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 23 Sep 2016 07:25:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 15837 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2016 07:23:04 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 23 Sep 2016 07:23:04 -0000 Received: from schplaf.org ([80.67.188.118] helo=morgoth.schplaf.org) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bnKol-00053w-D1 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:22:45 +0100 Received: by morgoth.schplaf.org (Postfix, from userid 5002) id 9C6824F7; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:15:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on morgoth.schplaf.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0, No Received: from minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr (salsa-01.enst-bretagne.fr [192.108.116.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: slash) by morgoth.schplaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DECBD1C1 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:15:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:14:02 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe Bach To: mutt-users@mutt.org Message-ID: <20160923071402.GE8526@minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr> References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160918064328.ts37vzdr6ehds6ln@lovelace.schplaf> <20160921104046.GD1147@adversary.org> <20160921213236.GD24944@dragontoe.org> <20160922211841.GA2162@dragontoe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FN+gV9K+162wdwwF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160922211841.GA2162@dragontoe.org> X-PGP-Key: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?search=0xE9324BDEC124FF27&fingerprint=on&hash=on&exact=on&op=index X-IM-Jabber: jcb@im.schplaf.org X-WebSite: http://www.schplaf.org X-Operating-System: A real one: Gentoo Linux X-Cthulhu: Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIdbPuQjQhlEHM2e+a3MZ8ctbZUwvO9wqRY4OgelZCK5cx1wTMkEUUoeb KIhkyzl2dMyHM/lQINdtG8vrH1tD/1GHchG7UCGe+hbk6hFMPZazrhTg/4q2QU37a0WxDeSOQqEi O55Lt1OfX4Q2NNU2iRID/AGC3RFugPW11HIScqQgISimHpAo9jO+doIgCqhbvwy+d/68v+2PVJE9 70CxzRUccBIk1Sag4dKiqCrF8eZZBk6HpfuyBvXsTkPMT38gZ8dRwT5c0pI1Go+Ti1E5LF7i3h3w mAJHhB5TDWVnLs8FFpmtMuO56q7BznSN6SugFMOpyKA69LF1Ge2GaGfxmfrQuMYAAwF5f/XA3e/q xFlkeyNAu+TGy4S13Qpcc/K5CGReSdkbj51gB8ZMj8t/+kHPaHMyqcul/+IgNy0t/W2ylnEaTdft T8Kul6ZpNgSqNH06rIM6ClqDToHTLIJs0/eIwLzRWNJ5cyPxQaCa99or/cuW/PWBpXnkmCA6bOjS sG6FRHh5k0PrubRSCSbv0dc= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1NQQU0/XQ==?= Re: PGP sigs fail verification X-FidoGuard-Class: unsure X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.80) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bnKuo-0007v3-Cf X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-6.299, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24785@mutt.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, > OK, I lied. All of the signatures were good except for two messages > from Jean-Christophe: =20 >=20 > 20160921191202.GB18462@lovelace.schplaf > 20160921195336.GD18462@lovelace.schplaf >=20 > Both of those were bad. The first of his was good: >=20 > 20160921060257.GB29391@minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr Exactly, the main difference is the fact I did not use the same computer to send the emails. In both cases, I have custom headers (for instance this email should also have custom headers). I did tests with my different addresses, different keys and different computers. Only my personal computer "generates" the error. JC --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJX5NY0AAoJEOkyS97BJP8nFLIP/A541LSnjny22bd7OpI6Cwje qKQmKqrhjDbjN6Ds0CmUKyojChQtVb+rgxsAhkgWffVu0hmsquihSvLF7QQqgbTZ dyp3/xF9slO2cEhu2DeVuEjjBAzFjooQkJWhzAjKZkGHR4WjHSQxKPI2XtYYLul+ iovDX+JZZyeAsr0IDEoLPBe9eaEukemEkY2vCILpIIBtI2kBsGQplaZev/ZDSH7P eRfRKT0bTChgWkDy1iEpBf6mo24JXnytooneMwRD21+AhWPDiG1PmqnyZ3QwAJJi 9YHkFQBOKnEGpL1OID79EuTkUzBZS0Io9isLGNUqVu5M+tZoXq7LId04n9wJxzRQ 2kaLNOkrMtUa1taCQv2XXS1GCVSJv97sMeLIBNQKt1kkvpoLukzc7+Ijkq9BlxOe PDcBDKnW4TMHeNwH1rJTP9NhJEzARhofWbAnoMtVkoKYUlnxvnvbCxKqn9poe6E+ IwDJ63ar+Jd+7BeupzvlVP8oS2/AiJ2FpU8/0otJ2VBgxQ8Eww1eagfsXB3VK/Dr X3BnwC+zgI34sJUKZXMXmQ507W31Nm75M3NU+qLkMQghpiPCXn/VbiF5WEYeOIyH MZLIIkgNzKiIbpyG2lyg3S+GCiUxq+QJvKgP8M43Ab7WRuWApDpZqasCe0VqS6jM yQwApyqziBASbQ4UPVv0 =pIut -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF--