On Wed, Sep 21, 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> 1. Some (apparently genuine) mails fail with "BAD signature", _both_
> when reading through mutt and when verifying manually with gpg. This is
Please provide examples so others can check your findings (compare
the tar file I sent out -- it shows that adding an X-Header causes
a signature failure).
> 2. In _one_ case only so far, the same mail checks out with manual gpg,
> but mutt gives "BAD signature". This is clearly a flea, but I have no
See above: please provide the mail which exhibits this problem.
It would be nice if we can track down the problem(s), but we need
examples to reproduce the errors.
(text/plain)