Author: Claus Assmann
Date:
To: mutt-users
Subject: Re: New thread about PGP sigs, part 1: Mutt disagrees with gpg
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> ... and I still get BAD sig from mutt.
You can debug what mutt does:
set pgp_verify_command="/tmp/v %s %f"
where /tmp/v is some simple script like:
cat "$1" >/tmp/sig
cat "$2" >/tmp/body
so now you have what mutt considers the body and the signature and
you can invoke gpg on it yourself, e.g.,
gpg --verify /tmp/sig /tmp/body
and you can compare these files with those that you used as input
for your gpg check.
(text/plain)