Re: New thread about PGP sigs, part 1: Mutt disagrees with g…

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MIan Zimmerman at <-
MIan Zimmerman at ->
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Author: Claus Assmann
Date:  
To: mutt-users
Subject: Re: New thread about PGP sigs, part 1: Mutt disagrees with gpg
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote: 

>                                                           mutt    gpg
> http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147417425713497&q=raw    BAD     GOOD

Verifies fine for me (in mutt).

Now the question is: is it "just" your setup, or does it fail for
others too? If so, what is common between the setups where the
verification fails?
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Demo how Lurker would work for Mutt Archives
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: PGP sigs fail verificationRe: PGP sigs fail verification->
Lurker Archived Email Correspondence administrated by Miroslav RovisLurker (version 2.3)