On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> * Claus Assmann <mutt+users@???> [2016-09-22 13:26]:
> > Did you see my mail about removing the X-Header from the first part? > no I didn't. Which specific header you're talking about? However it
Hmm, why not? Did those mails end up in your spam folder
(because of that $#%^@ tag which I didn't remove)?
Just 'e' such a mail and you'll see the X-Header: remove it,
and check the sig again.
> seems that you have figured it out and that a patch will be made ready
> soon.
Nope, not from me.
IMHO adding such an X-Header is "cute" but useless (and it breaks
things). So if someone wants that "feature" to work, then it's up
to them to provide a fix or at least file a bug report such that a
developer can reproduce (and maybe fix) the problem.
(text/plain)