Re: [SPAM?] Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature [Was: urlview not l…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)
Delete this message
Author: Ben McGinnes
Date:  
To: mutt-users
New-Topics: Re: PGP sigs fail verification
Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature [Was: urlview not listing the links right]
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 08:43:28AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Can anyone else verify Miro's signature? I'm getting "BAD signature"
> > both in mutt, and when I extract the signed part and try to verify it
> > with gpg from the command line.
> >
> > mutt 1.5.24, gpg 2.0.28, libgcrypt 1.7.3.
> >
> > This just happened to me on another mailing list too, so I strongly
> > suspect it is me and not the senders.
>
> The signature appears as BAD here too (with mutt-1.7.0-r4, gnupg-2.0.28,
> libgcrypt 1.7.3).


All four of Miro's sigs were fine for me. Yours, however, wasn't.

One of Miro's:

Good signature from: Miroslav Rovis (consacrated to Heart of Jesus)
+<miro.rovis@???>
            created: Sun 18 Sep 14:53:59 2016
WARNING: We have NO indication whether the key belongs to the person named as
+shown above
Fingerprint: FCF1 3245 ED24 7DCE 4438  55B7 EA98 8488 4FBA F0AE


Yours on the message I'm responding to:

*BAD* signature from: Jean-Christophe Bach (personal address)
+<jc.bach@???>
                 aka: Jean-Christophe Bach (www.april.org) <jcbach@???>
                 aka: Jean-Christophe Bach (www.fsf.org)
+<jc.bach@???>
                 aka: Jean-Christophe Bach (Personal - LDN infrastructure)
+<jc@???>
             created: Thu  1 Jan 10:00:00 1970


But it's probably just an intermittent thing unless it keeps happening
with your config.

As for mine, I'm running Mutt 1.7.0 (2016-08-17), gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.15,
libgcrypt 1.7.3 and GPGME 1.7.0-beta292 with the GPGME options
compiled into Mutt.


Regards,
Ben

P.S. Murphy's law dictates that the sig on this message of mine be
bad, no matter how consistently it works elsewhere. ;)