Author: Ian Zimmerman Date: To: mutt-users Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification
On 2016-09-21 08:02, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> > I conjecture that the BAD result in the case of Jean-Christophe's
> > message, #4 above, results from him inserting a non-standard X- header
> > in the signed MIME part. I don't have an explanation for the other BAD
> > results.
> OK, I try without any custom header (this email). I removed all my_hdr
> fields to try. Note that this email is sent from another computer than
> the previous one (dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.7.3, mail-client/mutt-1.5.24-r2,
And voila - this one is GOOD here! Dragons slain: 1.
Of course, there's the question on how your sending mutt managed to
insert a MIME part header, reacting to a my_hdr directive - if in fact
all you did was a my_hdr. That would definitely be a flea.
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right?
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: