Author: Miroslav Rovis Date: To: mutt-users Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification
On 160920-20:01-0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I did the manual gpg test on multiple mails, this time properly
> massaging them into the RFC 3156 format. To get to 3156 I had to go from the 1982's rfc822 (then follow rfc2045
through 2049, and only then 3156)... Only rfc822 done here.
> I conjecture that the BAD result in the case of Jean-Christophe's
> message, #4 above, results from him inserting a non-standard X- header
> in the signed MIME part. I don't have an explanation for the other BAD
> results. I have rfc822 fresh in my mind. User headers are perfectly legal. They
only "might later be preempted" (quoting from that 1982 rfc) if their
name becomes officially accepted or sumesuch.